I believe the answer is: Socrates
In the nature vs nurture debate, socrates supported the ' nature' part of the argument. Which mean that he believed that the behaviour and characteristics that displayed by individuals are influenced by our genetic. Which led him to believe that children have an innate concept of justice
<span>The answer is B) contradicted Scripture. A great example of how the Bible contradicts the heliocentric theory is Joshua, X 12-13 ("Then spake Joshua to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jashar? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hastened not to go down about a whole day.")</span>
Changing a set of scores that were in the form of number correct into a set of scores that now represent percent, is an example of data transformation.
The process of changing the format, structure, or values of data is known as data transformation. Data can be modified at two points in the data pipeline for initiatives including data analytics. Data transformation serves as the middle phase in an ETL (extract, transform, load) process, which is commonly used by businesses with on-premises data warehouses.
The benefits of data transformation are:
•Data that has been transformed might be simpler to use for both people and machines.
•The compatibility of applications, systems, and data formats is made possible by data transformation. It could be necessary to modify data differently if it is utilized for different reasons.
Learn more about data transformation here:
brainly.com/question/17996015
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The kind of testimony their claim represents is a general statement without any evidence to prove it. It is not a claim of fact because it does not present any evidence. It is neither a claim of policy. We could say that it could be a claim of value, but it doesn't say if this is good or bad.
So it is important to include some type of evidence to back our affirmations. Without the proper evidence, then it is their opinions against ours.
So it is hard to believe that hunters Harlen E. Ford and Billy Mills have seen Bigfoot at one time if they don't provide proper evidence.
An easy was to remember the main causes of WW1 is to remember the acronym, M.A.I.N. This stands for Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism, Nationalism. The actual event that supposedly triggered WW1 is the Archduke Ferdinand by the Turkish terrorist group, The Black Hand.
- Tony, the GREAT :)