The correct answer is a. the subjective meaning that deviants impute to their own deviant experience
<span>Phenomenologists refer to social scientists who emphasize the role of subjective consciousness, introspection and personal interpretations of reality. From a phenomenonological point of view, deviant reality refers to the personal and subjective meaning of what deviance really is. While one individual might consider a certain act as deviant, another individual might not consider it as deviant. In other words, what constitutes and defines deviance is subjective and differs from person to person. </span>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Choose the propaganda style that best fits the statement below. "My opponent, Governor Thomason has raised taxes, increased spending and lied to you, the American people."
plain folks
name calling
card stacking
bandwagon
Answer:
The propaganda style that best fits the statement is:
B. name calling.
Explanation:
We can easily reach the conclusion above via elimination. Let's take a look at each of the options:
A. plain folks: a style of propaganda that attempts to depict a certain person as "one of the people" or "average Joe". It's commonly used by politicians to show us they are ordinary people just like us. This option is INCORRECT.
<u>B. name calling: a style that consists of saying bad things about one's opponent in order to make people see him from a negative perspective. Often involves attributing pejorative nicknames or adjectives to the other. This is precisely what we have here, since the speaker is calling his opponent a liar. This option is CORRECT.</u>
C. card stacking: a style which manipulates information in order to make something or someone look better. This option is INCORRECT.
D. bandwagon: a technique that relies on the idea of "jumping on board" or "everyone else is doing this, and so should you." This is clearly not the case here. This option is INCORRECT.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because theres no "method" to science, all scientists work differently and all have different methods.
Answer:
1. nontrade act 2. war pigeons 3. c 4. Fort Mchenry
Explanation:
hope this is right!!!!!
-maddie
Answer:
Explanation:
The main similarity between political parties and interest groups is that they both seek to achieve certain policy objectives. These can be a broad range of policy objectives or only a relative few.
Political parties have a large number of policy objectives that they wish to achieve, whereas pressure groups tend to have only a few. Some pressure groups, such as those that campaign for the protection of the environment, are based around a single issue.
As such, pressure groups tend to have greater coherence than political parties, as it is much easier for their members to unite around a common single objective than a broad range of policies.
This helps to explain why pressure groups endeavor to bring about changes in policy without attaining political power. Their focus is so narrow that it would be virtually impossible for them to secure the kind of broad-based coalition that is essential in a democracy for a political party.
However, despite remaining outside of the formal democratic process, pressure groups—as their name implies—can still exert considerable pressure on policy-makers in order to get the changes that they seek.
Such changes are not always forthcoming, however, because political parties tend to be quite broad-based coalitions. This means that policy-makers need to take into consideration a broad range of stakeholders whose interests are often opposed to those of relevant pressure groups. As a consequence, any changes made by political parties in power tend not to be as bold or as radical as pressure groups, who don't have to deal with the necessary compromises of political power in a democracy, would like.
