The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
A President can employ a number of strategies to ensure the successful confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee.
The first is a careful and intense vetting process beforehand to ensure that there are no hidden traps that might derail the nomination.
The second is to employ a legislative "sherpa" to introduce the nominee around the Senate. This is often a former senator who has excellent relations with the other senators and who can vouch for the character and background of the nominee before the Senate.
All of the above options except for "<span>D. Only Christians were allowed to hold offices in the government are </span>reasons why Christianity appealed to the people of the Roman Empire.
