Select all that apply. Which of the following is not an example of a "pro" of getting news about an election from a mainstream n
ews source? Corporate censorship prevents news about the candidate's criminal driving record from getting out. The election is covered on a minute-by-minute basis at the click of a mouse. A reporter may be fired if she lies about a candidate. A reporter has responsibility for checking dates, statistics, and facts.
Corporate censorship prevents news about the candidate's criminal driving record from getting out.
A "pro" is something that is positive. In this case, the positive should be for the public not the candidate. Option A is the best choice because it keeps information from the general public because of corporate censorship. While a criminal driving record may or may not sway the public's vote, the idea that the public could be kept in the dark about a candidate's past because of corporate power is definitely a negative.
The other options could be seen as "pros" People following the election may enjoy minute-by-minute coverage. A reporter being fired for lying about a candidate would lead to only the truth being reported. Also a reporter having the ethical responsibility of checking facts would be another positive. It would allow the public to trust the news a little bit more.
it's a theory that women are less ambitious than men when it comes to their career. Age and motherhood causes women to lower their career goals compared to men. however women showed to have similar level of ambition to men at the beginning of their career
Dear Mr. District officer, Crime in our neighborhood has risen to an all time high since the shortage of street lights in the area. I fear for not only my life but my family’s. It is obligatory to put these lights back up to put an end to the heinous acts that are occurring in our streets.