Answer:
Explanation:
when only one participant wielded a threat (used the gate to block the opponent), the person with the gate won more money
When both participants could wield threats, both sides lost money.
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
In simple words, the above case relates to the situation of lack of evidence. For proving an alleged criminal to be the culprit the law requires a full hard core proof after no further questioning regarding guilt of the culprit could be done.
In this case, eye witnesses or video camera recording could have been an aid fr Patty but as she had not presented anything to the court she can do nothing.
