Answer:
Both sources present the dangers that would occur if Singapore became an independent state.
Explanation:
The two sources present the danger that Malaysia would be in if Singapore became an independent and communist state. This concern began with preparations for Singapore to separate from the British Empire and merge with Malaysia. The problem was that communist ideologies were very influential in Singapore, but were prevented from being established because of the presence of the British Empire. However, once singapore became an independent state, communist ideologies could dominate and cause Singapore to try to dominate malaysia and not merge.
In this case, we can confirm that the similarity of these two sources is the subject that they address, which is the same.
Answer:
The Anglo colonists, as the name implies, were people from the United States who were mostly of British descent. They can be divided in two groups: those who came from the neighboring Louisiana, and expanded the slave plantations in Eastern Texas, and those who came from Appalachia, and founded small farms in Central Texas.
The Tejanos were the original colonists of Spanish descent, who came from other parts of Mexico. They spoke Spanish, were catholic, and had ties to Latin America. However, they were also part of the independece movement in Texas, but many of them opposed the annexation of the state to the United States (this was supported en masse by the Anglos for obvious reasons).
Hello There! ^_^
Your question: During what years did the French and Indian war take place..?
Your answer: The year 1754 is when the French and the Indian war took place.
Hope this helps!
Some British agents from Canada helped to arm Native Americans in the west. This helped them fight off enemies.
With the GDP per capita, this depends on the wealth and the population of a country. For somewhere such as the Arab Emirates, they have a small population, but a fair amount of wealth, so this then increases the GDP. The situation is similar with Kuwait. Iran has also been affected by War, meaning that some of the infrastructure will hav been destroyed, and that people would not be able to work and make money, which is then something that will have a direct impact on the GDP. With countries such as Jordan and Sudan, As far as I'm aware, they are relatively poor countries with a high population, meaning that the GDP will be lower and split between more people,therefore, meaning that it will be low. With regards to A). Iran is a country that has definitely been affected by this, following the war. B) A large majority of the countries that have been mentioned are also predominately desert, so where there is not people that are making money, this is something that is then not contributing to the GDP. Countries such as Kuwait and UAE also have large oil reserves, and this is something that can contribute to wealth hugely, and the smaller the population, the less people the GDP has to be spread between, and therefore, this increases it. With environmental disasters, these can have a huge impact, and the amount of money that is being made is also greatly reduced, and the expenditure is also increased, which is also something that can decrease the GDP.
Hope this helps you!
