1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laiz [17]
3 years ago
7

political cartoon from 1986, president reagan (U.S.) and premier mikhail gorbachev (U.S.S.R.) are engaged in an intense arm wres

tling match. various symbols are used to explain what is happening. discuss three symbols AND what message the artist was trying to convey by including three symbols in the cartoon.
History
2 answers:
Savatey [412]3 years ago
3 0
Are you referring to the arm wrestiling cartoon. This was a very popular political cartoon of the 1950's. One symbol would be the form fitting flags on tthe arm wrestlers. The artist is trying convey that the leaders are fit and want their countries to be active and healthy. The 2nd symbol are the beedy eyes under Reagan's and Gorbechov's TV faces. The artist is trying to convey that there is a shadow government in each country that actually controls their actions.
The 3rd Symbol would be the smiling faces on the screens. The artist is trying to say that the leaders are trying to be friendly even with everything else going on.
I hope that helps and you like my answer so I can get addition points on the site.
nirvana33 [79]3 years ago
3 0
This political cartoon shows the extreme battle between the United States and the Soviet Union.  In this battle, President Reagan and Premier Gorbachev would go to great lengths to win the fight.  As you can see they used a super secret formula much like the one that captain america used.  They became big and beefy and were going to fight to the death.  The second symbol is their big fight on tv for the whole world to see.  The third symbol is the lightning coming out of their fists of furry that symbolizes the epic fifty-foot battle that they would have all accross the globe.
You might be interested in
How did the Black Death effect Europe. Only out of the box answers please
Marat540 [252]
Answer:

Economic Impact

Workers' wages skyrocketed as arable land lay fallow; landlords, desperate for people to work their land, were forced to renegotiate farmers' wages. Famine followed. Widespread death eroded the strict hereditary class divisions that had, for centuries, bound peasants to land owned by local lords.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are the executive powers divided in state governments?
zlopas [31]

The correct answer would be C. State governments, using the USA as the basis, have jurisdiction and are responsible for its territories but are a part of the USA and are not legally recognized on the international level and don’t have same status as for example Germany. They share the organizational structure with the federal government. So, they have executive, judicial and legislative branches in accordance with the principle of checks and balances. Also following that principle, the executive power is split between the Governor and other state administrators like attorney general, secretary of state and so on.





8 0
3 years ago
Unlike a direct democracy, in which all citizens decide laws, a representative democracy involves
Ivenika [448]
The people elect representatives to vote on the laws for them
3 0
3 years ago
The throne was inherited in which kingdom?
lina2011 [118]
Im pretty sure its c. England and France:)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did religion change the lives of the people and their government in India ?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

Most of the states in ancient India were politically stable. They often remained for long periods free from internal squabbles and intrigues of the kind we see today. This situation helped them a great deal in initiating measures aimed at improving the quality of life of the common people. How could the states enjoyed political peace for long stretches of time to undertake such measures? The answer is that the origin of the state in ancient India was strongly believed to lay in dharma (religion) itself and, therefore, treated as an institution not to be opposed or disobeyed.

A close study of the scriptures of ancient India reveals that the people during the Vedic and later periods firmly believed that the state had been set up by god Himself. One of the India, Kautilya, held the view that God created the state for administering a benevolent yet strict rule over the people. Manu, the famous lawgiver, said that the state was needed to enforce discipline in the life prone to act in unrighteous ways.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Clara barton worked as a ___ in the civil war.
    8·2 answers
  • 2 Points
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a similarity between the United States Constitution and all state constitutions
    12·2 answers
  • Who prevented the annexation of hawaii by the united states in 1893?
    14·1 answer
  • What best identifies a similar principle as it appears in the United States government?
    5·1 answer
  • Have Americans lived up to the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights, and how does it carry out its purpose?​
    11·2 answers
  • What was one effect of women being denied the right to speak at abolition rallies?
    5·2 answers
  • Texas became a separate province of Spain in _________.
    15·1 answer
  • Why did sir syed Ahmed khan wrote ' the causes of the indian revolt'?​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!