This assertion is accurate. The phrase "settlement pattern" in the scientific discipline of archaeology refers to the physical evidence of communities and networks in a particular area. This information is used to interpret how historically interdependent local groups of people interacted.
<h3>Why do we research settlement patterns?</h3>
In addition to providing information on the present economic, political, and social conditions, settlements and the patterns they leave behind on the surface of the Earth also serve as a historical record of previous conditions. The land-use and settlement patterns of the past are revealed through the current settlement patterns.
<h3>What influenced the patterns of settlement?</h3>
The physical geography of the land is one of the most fundamental elements influencing settlement patterns. Climate is important because it makes it harder for huge populations of people to dwell anywhere, especially if they depend on farming, if it's too dry, too cold, or too hot.
Learn more about settlement patterns: brainly.com/question/12795394
#SPJ4
Answer:
From the statement below, the one that correctly describes a nutrient content claim is the one that talks about reduced sodium being a product having twenty five percent less sodium than the main or original product.
Explanation:
Answer:
D-He lived for some time after the Boston Massacre and spoke to his doctor about what he saw.
Explanation:
On the night of the shooting, he heard the sound of the bell on the street and decided to go outside. He knew that the trouble had something to do with the British – his neighbor persuaded him to leave behind a small cutlass before he headed to King Street. When the shooting erupted, he was wounded while crossing the street with his friend.
For Carr, shot through his abdomen, death was inevitable. He was carried to his master’s house and was tended by Doctor Jeffries. It took him four days to die, but he refused to lay the blame for his agonizing death upon the soldiers. According to the Doctor’s testimony during the trial, Carr told him that he thought that the soldiers would have fired long before. Were the soldiers greatly abused? Yes, they were. Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Yes. So they fired in self-defense? Yes, and he did not blame whoever hit him.
This is really unspecific are there any answer choices because every lifestyle needs money to be spent on food necessarily like a roof over your head or just things you need to survive
