Answer:
1. When China decides to reduce its capital investment in the US, US's capital inflows, which are a source of loanable funds in the US, take a hit. This leads to a reduction in supply of loanable funds in the US, shifting the supply curve leftward.
2. When a ban is imposed on fast food restaurants, the amount loanable funds demanded by the fast food industry reduces, leading to a leftward shift m the demand curve of loanable funds.
3. When fast food restaurants are allowed to open franchised locations, the amount loanable funds demanded by the fast food industry increases, leading to a rightward shift m the demand curve of loanable funds.
4. When the US government reduces its deficit, it reduces its borrowings. A reduction in borrowing by the US government leads to a reduction in the demand for loanable funds, and therefore shifts the demand curve fur loanable funds leftward.
5. When individual start to spend more owing to the wealth effect, savings reduce, leading to a fall in the supply of loanable funds. Due to this, there occurs a leftward shift in the supply calve for loanable funds.
Tax multiplier amount = -9.00.Real GDP changed or increased by $9 billion. Less than $1 billion in spending would be required by the government. The explanation is that the tax multiplier's absolute value is bigger than the expenditure multiplier's absolute value, which is 10.
MPC = 1 - 0.90 = 0.10 MPS = Marginal Propensity to Save = 1 MPC = 1 - 0.90 = 0.10
As a result, we have:
The tax multiplier is equal to MPC / MPS, which is 0.90 / 0.10, or -9.00.Reduced tax X=-$1 billion
Tax multiplier equals -9.00.
Amount of change or growth in real GDP equals a decrease in taxes, multiplied by a -$1 tax multiplier.Multiplier for expenses = 1/ MPS = 1/ 0.10 = 10Real GDP growth is equal to the change in government spending multiplied by the expenditure multiplier (1). Solve for by substituting the appropriate values into equation (1). Government spending has changed.We possess.Change in government spending of $9 billion $9 billion / 10 = $0.90 billion in changes to government spending in one year.Given that the expenditure multiplier produced a change in government spending of $0.90 billion, this suggests that less than $1 billion in expenditures would be required.
To know more about Multiplier effect visit:
brainly.com/question/20565639
#SPJ4
Answer:
Tone ...................................
Complete question :
Your company has sales of $101,500 this year and cost of goods sold of $66,300. You forecast sales to increase to $118,900 next year. Using the percent of sales method, forecast next year's cost of goods sold. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 temporarily allows 100% bonus depreciation (effectively expensing capital expenditures). However, we will still include depreciation forecasting in this chapter and in these problems in anticipation of the return of standard depreciation practices during your career The forecasted cost of goods sold (COGS) is $ ___________ (Round to the nearest dollar.)
Answer:
$77,666
Explanation:
Given the following :
Sales for the year = $101,500
Cost of goods sold =$66,300
Forecasted increase in sales for next year = $118,900
Forecasted cost of goods sold for next year =?
Percentage cost of goods sold for this year:
Cost of goods sold / sales for this year
$66300/$101500
= 0.6532019
Forecasted cost of goods sold for next year:
(Forecasted increase in next year's sale * % cost of goods sold for this year)
= 118,900 * 0.6532019
= $77665.714
= $77666 ( nearest dollar)
Complete/Correct Question:
When the company's dry goods deliveries were late for the third time, Melissa withheld payment from her supplier until it was back on schedule. This is an example of ________ power.
a. reward
b. referent
c. legitimate
d. coercive
e. Expertise
Answer:
D, coercive
Explanation:
Coercive power is the ability of a manager to be able to make an employee/subordinate follow orders by the use of force.
In the above question, Melissa withholds payment after her order of dry goods came in late a third time.
Withholding payment forced the supplier to return to the scheduled arrangement of delivery.
Cheers.
