Answer:
I would go with C.
Explanation:
In the early day a man was burned on a stick because he killed his pregnant wife to eat her. And that is Canalbalism
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
Answer:
2. An early morning in a forest
Explanation:
They aren't at the castle he said "I saw you at the castle" They are looking for a oak tree they aren't there yet. It wouldn't have been a long time ago on the balcony.
It's B. The verb 'tell' is ditransitive, i.e. , it can take both direct/indirect objects.
