1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeyben [28]
3 years ago
10

URGENT!!!

History
1 answer:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is the Missouri Compromise.

You might be interested in
¿Qúe potencias extranjeras participaron en la guerra? ¿Cómo se resolvió el conflicto coreano?
Igoryamba

Answer:

El conflicto coreano es un conflicto en curso basado en la división de Corea entre Corea del Norte (República Popular Democrática de Corea) y Corea del Sur (República de Corea), que afirman ser el único gobierno y estado legítimo de toda Corea. Durante la Guerra Fría, Corea del Norte estaba respaldada por la Unión Soviética, China y sus aliados comunistas, mientras que Corea del Sur era respaldada por los Estados Unidos y sus aliados occidentales. La división de Corea por parte de las potencias externas se produjo al final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, a partir de 1945, y las tensiones estallaron en la Guerra de Corea, que duró desde 1950 hasta 1953. Cuando terminó la guerra, ambas facciones fueron devastadas, con la destrucción total de gran parte de los países, pero la división se mantuvo. Corea del Norte y del Sur continuaron un enfrentamiento militar, con choques periódicos. El conflicto sobrevivió al colapso del Bloque del Este de 1989 a 1991 y continúa actualmente.

Explanation:

espero y te ayude

4 0
3 years ago
I NEED THIS DONE ASAP!!! What is a large holding of land and power called?
daser333 [38]

Answer:

empire. a large holding of land and power.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What does this diagram suggest about the strength on the United States economy in the 1920s?
Korolek [52]
Booming 20s it was high
7 0
3 years ago
Why was Andrew Jackson's action considered by some too be unlawful?
AveGali [126]
Because his effort to drive out the Native Americans from US territories would be 'ethnic cleansing.'  <span />
3 0
3 years ago
Do you think wealthy individuals like rockefeller , cranegie , and gates have a duty to become philanthropists?
Andrej [43]

Answer:

No, there is no reason that anyone person's wealth should mean they need to become philanthropists.

Explanation:

Hope this helped you in time c;

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were African slaves brought to the Americas ​
    5·2 answers
  • What was the central city of the Hellenistic period?
    11·1 answer
  • How do you think Bill Robinson related to the Harlem Renaissance movement​
    15·1 answer
  • Did one person make a difference in an area of society that we can still see the effects of their efforts today?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the Sugar Act in 20 or more words. giving 20 pints and brainlyist
    13·2 answers
  • Which reason best explains why the population density of western china is so low?
    11·1 answer
  • Under James Monroe the United States expanded by:
    8·2 answers
  • ANSWER PLZ! I will mark as brainliest
    15·2 answers
  • Describe at least two of Nast's achievements in his struggle to expose Tammany Hall presented in the document.
    12·1 answer
  • What was the risk situation in which sir douglas mawson was?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!