The answer is option C: this was a war seen by the Filipinos as a continuation of their independence while it was seen by the American government as an insurrection.
The armed conflict between The USA and the First Philippine Republic took place in 1899. It began when the latter refused to consent to the Treaty of Paris, in which the Kingdom of Spain renounced to the domain of the Philippines in favor of The United States.
For the Filipinos, the war extended from the military fight against the Kingdom of Spain that started in 1896, whereas the Americans considered it a refusal of obedience.
The atmosphere helps us breathe,it provides a shield(radiation shield), a security blanket to keep us warm, and last but not least weathering the storms.
Answer:
d. his negotiations were always backed by the threat of military force.
Explanation:
What was the Big Stick Policy? It is the name often referred to as US foreign policy under Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909). Roosevelt acted to maintain a friendly and cordial air in the negotiations, while at the same time making clear the possibility of using force to overwhelm his opponents and achieve his intent. The president would also create the Roosevelt Corollary, in which he supported the Monroe Doctrine (marked by the phrase “America for Americans”) and sought to extend it from a viewpoint that favored the United States. To this end, it has transformed the Americas into an exclusively American sphere of influence, especially the Central American area.
Troops on the British front
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
