Answer:
Explanation:
Humphrey wanted to create dances that reflected her individuality and were appropriate to contemporary America. To develop a personal technique she spent many hours in front of a mirror and came to believe that all movement fell within the “arc between two deaths,” or the range between motionless balance and falling imbalance incapable of recovery. She understood that every movement a dancer makes away from the centre of gravity has to be followed by a compensating readjustment to restore balance and prevent uncontrolled falling; the more extreme and exciting the controlled fall attempted by the dancer, the more vigorous must be the recovery. As Mary Wigman had utilized space as the ever-present antagonist, so Humphrey made dramatic use of gravity, displaying the human desire for security (balance) in conflict with the urge for progress and adventure (imbalance). Another of her innovative theories held that movement is not always the consequence of emotional impulse but can itself create meaning.
<h3><u>Protected poachers and black marketeers from the wrath of the law from Hunger Games:</u></h3>
The poachers and black marketers do their businesses without worrying about the penalties or the punishment of the law because some of the peacekeepers like to have fresh meat and they won’t complain this to their legal departments.
They are themselves the best customer of purchasing meat. So they have allowed poaching in some areas. Moreover, the treaty of treason gave them new laws after some people are defeated in the capital war.
A thesis statement must always MAKE AN ASSERTION TO BE PROVEN BY THE BODY OF THE TEXT.
It can come either at the beginning of the introduction or at the end of it.
Answer:
Sentence A is correct
Explanation:
Let’s begin by looking at Sentences B-D:
<em>B. our house was built on the sight of an old factory.</em>
This sentence uses the word “sight”<em> </em>incorrectly. The word should be site, as in “location.”
<em>C. Whose scheduled to work at the restaurant tonight?</em>
<em />
This sentence uses the word “whose” incorrectly. The word should be who’s, as in the contraction of “who is.”
<em>D. Kim was upset because everyone had a job accept her.</em>
<em />
This sentence uses the word “accept“ incorrectly. The word should be except, as in “excluding.”
That leaves Sentence A, which uses all words (including the homophone “clothes”) correctly.
I hope this helps!
