Several studies conducted by Nisbett and his colleagues suggest that people who grow up in east Asian cultures think more <u>holistically </u>than people who grow up in western cultures.
<h3>What is holistic thinking?</h3>
A person who is known to be a holistic thinker is one who looks at everything as an aspect of a whole.
They are known to be people who nothing can ever stands alone and nothing is said to be linear in time or in space in their very eyes.
Therefore, Several studies conducted by Nisbett and his colleagues suggest that people who grow up in east Asian cultures think more <u>holistically </u>than people who grow up in western cultures.
Learn more about Asian cultures from
brainly.com/question/25871918
#SPJ1
Because they're from different parties.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
