A legislative system with only one house or assembly is known as a unicameral legislature or simply unicameralism. While a bicameral legislature is a type of governance in which the two chambers share the same rights and authority.
For instance, Finland's parliament only has one chamber. A unicameral system's main benefit is more effective law making since it makes the legislative process easier and eliminates the chance of a deadlock between two houses.
India is an example of bicameralism, where each of its 28 states and the union both have two houses. In a bicameral legislature, the two chambers share responsibility for enacting and implementing legislation.
Stability, more diverse representation, and the passage of high-caliber legislation are all benefits of a bicameral legislature. Deadlock and uneven representation are two drawbacks. A bicameral parliamentary system's stability stems from the two chambers' capacity to balance each other's influence.
To learn more about unicameral legislature and bicameral legislature refer
brainly.com/question/2880693
#SPJ4
Answer:
B.interior
Explanation:
because that's is where is locate
Answer:
The Mongol Empire was founded by Gengis Khan (early known as Temujin) in 1206.
Explanation:
Mongols acknowledged as Nomadic horse people from the eastern steppe lands of Asia that formed the largest empire under Genghis Khan. He was able to create an empire by uniting the clans of the steppe under his leadership. The Mongols briefly ruled most of Russia, Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. The Mongols expanded their empire using speedy and crucial attacks with an armed and disciplined army. Mongol was known as the best horseback fighter in their time.
Answer: e. c and d
Explanation:
Smith engaging in riskier actions or investments will mean that Smith has a higher probability of earning either a higher or lower income.
When investing in a risky investment, there will be a higher return attached to it. This is why Corporate bonds yield more than Treasury bonds. The higher risk is to compensate the investor (in this case Smith) for engaging in riskier behavior. If the investment is successful, the return will be paid meaning Smith gets a higher income than Jones who did not take the risk.
When investing in a risky investment, one must still remember that there is a reason the investment is considered risky. There is a higher chance that it will not pay out. Therefore, should Smith engage in more risk and it does not work out, Smith will earn a lower income than Jones who did not invest in the risky investment.
