1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
3 years ago
11

Increasing and decreasing the money supply through monetary policy is generally done by __________. the Federal Reserve Congress

the President the Federal Trade Commission
History
1 answer:
Irina18 [472]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The Federal Reserve The federal reserve buys and sells government securities from and to banks to change the money supply. When the Federal Reserve buys securities, they increase the money supply by putting liquid cash on the bank balance sheets which is then lent out. When they sell securities, they take liquid cash away from bank balance sheets and trade them illiquid securities.</span>
You might be interested in
How was mansa musa able to bring islamic culture to Mali
Lerok [7]
Mansa Musa was able to bring Islamic culture to Mali by bringing Arab scholars and architects to Mali. Mansa Musa is known as the greatest ruler of his time. He was able to increase the Islamic culture in Africa. He was also called the country's architect. I hope this could help you :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Native American groups attempted to resist the Indian Removal Act? (Select all that apply.)
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

The policy of the 'Indian Removal Act' had controversy in its application after agreement. This is because the issue is deemed an issue for the U.S. indigenous people. Many Indian tribes do not support this policy and try to counter and Cherokee one of them.

Explanation:

• Indian Removal Act

The' Indian Removal Act ' policy is one of U.S. President Andrew Jackson's racial policies. On May 28, 1830, this policy was signed. Five of the most important tribes are threatened as an outcome of this policy. Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole are among these. This policy called for debate and was regarded in the United States to demean the Indians. Including Cherokee Indians who believe this policy to be unfair. Recalling that the Cherokee Indians played a quite wide part in the war against the British occupation in 1812.

• Cherokee in the United States

Cherokee is not an Indian tribe that could be underestimated. Cherokee gave the role of their land to the United States Government during the United States Revolution. With this land grant, the government promised Cherokee protection. The Cherokee Indians, however, were pushed out by the' Indian Removal Act' policy.

The policy harmed the Cherokee Indians by the U.S government to be moved to the Oklahoma area. The Cherokee Indians, however, remained resistant and opposed the policy. They attempted to reject the policy on the pretext of protecting their homeland from the oppressed white community. The Cherokee Indians endured a tragic destiny despite the battle and this tragedy became known as ' The Trail of Tears ' that claimed the lives of as many as 4,000 Cherokee people.

Learn More

If you’re interested learning more about this topic, we recomended you also take a look at the following question:

• How did the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Chesapeake, and Southern colonies develop differently? brainly.com/question/13165633

• Which of these was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/13165577

Keyword: Indian Removal Act, Cherokee, US Government, American History

Subject: History

Class: 10-12

Sub-chapter:  American History

8 0
3 years ago
What did President Jackson want American Indian tribes to do with their land?
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

choose A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group has traditionally lacked access to education in Africa?
goldfiish [28.3K]
Which group has traditionally lacked access to education in africa? B) immigrants
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two Spanish missions remained after Spain change its policies in Texas?
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think Theodosius made the right decision in splitting the empire in two?<br> Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. The Jews were also known as what?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes America's Industrial Revolution? * 2 points The process that America underwent in the late 19th Ce
    6·1 answer
  • How did the coercive act made colonists mad
    6·1 answer
  • To purchase the sunday newspaper in jordan ambassadar gnehm will
    6·1 answer
  • What are reasons of opposing the alien and sedition act
    14·1 answer
  • In medieval European society was the king or the pope the most powerful figure?
    15·1 answer
  • What does the sentence mean "After the Crusades, many Jews were expelled from England
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true for both China and Japan?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!