- The correct answer is D. Substantive due process. The reason is simple, by passing the law, Congress has facilitated the compliance of federal authorities with the principle of procedural due process (the principle that if the government is going to deprive a person of life, liberty and/or property they have to follow the proper procedures as per the laws and the Constitution). Normally, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. However by passing this law Congress has bypassed such protections by stating that searching the home of anyone suspected of terrorism without a warrant is valid under the new law. However, the principle of Substantive Due process is clear: the fact that procedural due process was respected under the new laws does not prevent such law from being unconstitutional as it violates the Fourth amendment.
Answer:
first and second
Explanation:
Black citizens were denied access to the same public facilities as whites.
Marriages between white and nonwhite citizens were forbidden.
Nonwhite citizens were required to carry identification papers with them at all times.
Answer:
i think it is A because it sounds logical
Explanation:
<span>Which event is the CLEAREST example of conflict between state and national governments?
Answer:</span><span>
A) the Civil War
</span>
The incorrect statement about the renaissance is : C. Great Thinkers looked to the accomplishments of the middle ages as inspiration
This statement is False because many Great Thinkers looked at the Renaissance period as A dark Ages when no scientific accomplishment was made, no good art produced, and no great leader was born
hope this helps
