1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
15

How did President Franklin Roosevelt try to stop the Supreme Court from rejecting his programs?

History
2 answers:
NeTakaya3 years ago
5 0
<span>by proposing the judicial reform bill

hope this helps

</span>
galina1969 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is option 4: <u>By proposing the Judicial Reform Bill</u>

As an attempt to get more support for his NDP in his second term, in February 1937, Franklin Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Reform Bill, a legislative plan that would have allowed the President to add more justices to the Supreme Court by.

The plan, also called "court-packing", proposed to appoint one new justice for every sitting justice aged 70 years or older, resulting in a total of 50 new judges with six of them on the Supreme Court. This way, Roosevelt would have had more justices in favor of his plans and stop the Court from rejecting his programs.

You might be interested in
James Fennimore Cooper authored Rip Van Winkle in 1826.<br> t or f
bezimeni [28]
False 

Hope I helped!

~ Zoe
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the government support business over unions?
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

Unions were seen as a possibly illegal way to coerce employers into giving in to worker demands. the federal government took the side of employers, doing such things as issuing injunctions against strikes and even sending in troops to help break strikes up.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why was ulysses s. Grant such a successful general for the north after so many others had failed?.
sashaice [31]
Because he led the union armies to victory over the confederacy in the american civil war
7 0
2 years ago
Governor rick perry’s record of failures and achievements as chief executive of the state show that governors do matter.
prohojiy [21]
True. Although there are many people who believe that governors are irrelevant and that the president more or less decides everything with the congress, it is incorrect and bad governors can make a lot of damage to the state that the federal government has to repair out of tax payers money later.
7 0
3 years ago
Which best states how a section of the Missouri Compromise supported Dred Scott’s argument?
skelet666 [1.2K]

<em>Answer: </em><em>The Missouri Compromise declared that an enslaved person gained his or her freedom upon entering a free state.   </em>

<em>Explanation: edge 2020</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Grant has avoided applying for credit cards or taking loans. He only uses his savings to pay for purchases. What is the most lik
    7·2 answers
  • Pls hurry i dont have much time
    14·1 answer
  • Main ideas of the Renaissance
    8·1 answer
  • How is the enlightenment an example of cultural diffusion?
    13·1 answer
  • Halp
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    13·2 answers
  • 1. What cellular process does a mitochondrion perform for the cell?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement does Conrad Carl make about how wages in the garment industry affected employees ability to save money for the f
    15·1 answer
  • How did Upton Sinclair gather information for his exposé of labor conditions and sanitation practices in the early 1900s?
    12·1 answer
  • The land ordinance of _______ determined how many western lands would be __________
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!