Elie Wiesel uses pathos because his words appeal to people's emotions.
They use it to make their study more accurate by using their findings as evidence, which deem to show proof for their theory.
I would say A, simple listing. It's not going in order of time, because they aren't dated in any way. I wouldn't say it was a cause and effect because you are just explaining each verbal form. It doesn't seem to have to be in that particular order, it's just how it's placed. You aren't comparing anything, and you none of them seem to be less important then the other. So I believe the answer would be A.
Caldwell?
<span>1. go forth, under the open sky, and list (line 14) </span>
<span>2. to nature's teachings, while from all around (line 15) </span>
<span>3. to mix forever with the elements (line 27) </span>
<span>4. turns with his share, and treads upon. the oak (line 30) </span>
Answer:
D. Asking clarifying questions
Explanation:
According to the question, Frank politely interrupts Nia to ask if her information about coal mines apply to only the mines in the United States or all around the globe.
The discussion technique Frank is clearly using is asking clarifying questions. He asked the question to get clarity and avoid misconceptions because without his question, someone can wrongly (or rightly) assume that the information Nia gave is about all coal mines
