Explanation:
Socrates and Meno both describe that at least virtue is the part of wisdom but we can not say that a most virtuous person is most beneficent only out of knowledge. This is the last point where Socrates and Meno failed to find virtue itself in considering such a virtuous person. This suggests puzzles Meno but Socrates explains that they have been looking for that virtue as a kind of teachable knowledge. The good deeds of virtuous men could equally be the result of not of the knowledge but the opinion.
Even Socrates gives the example of the guide on the road to the Larissa whether the guide has the knowledge and the true opinion about the way that results in the same
Answer:
2) Because she might not have healthy/good cells that help
Explanation:
I am not sure if this is right but I feel like it is?
Implied powers are those that the "necessary and proper" language in Article I, Section 8 implies but which are not expressly defined in the constitution.
To enact all laws necessary and appropriate for carrying out the aforementioned powers, as well as all other powers granted to the United States government or any department or officer thereof by this constitution. The Necessary and Proper Clause1 closes up Article I's list of the enumerated powers of Congress by broadly stating that those powers also include the right to employ all appropriate measures to carry out those specified authorities. According to the Necessary and Proper Clause, all Implied and incidental powers that are helpful to the exercise of an enumerated power are included in the congressional power. The history of the Necessary and Proper Clause's insertion in the Constitution and its significance during the ratification discussions are first covered in this section. The section then moves on to early judicial interpretations of the Clause, culminating in Chief Justice John Marshall's famous McCulloch v. Maryland ruling from 1819. The section finishes with a discussion of contemporary Supreme Court opinions on the reach of Congress's jurisdiction under the Implied and Proper Clause, following a brief overview of the significant nineteenth-century Supreme Court decisions on the Clause after McCulloch.
Learn more about Implied and Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/29440625
#SPJ4
Answer:
Greek citizenship stemmed from the fusion of two elements, (a) the notion of the individual state as a 'thing' with boundaries, a history, and a power of decision, and (b) the notion of its inhabitants participating in its life as joint proprietors.
Explanation: .Ancient Greek and Roman societies granted their citizens rights and responsibilities that slaves, foreigners, and other people who were considered subordinate did not possess. Citizenship rights changed over time. While the Greeks tended to limit citizenship to children born to citizens, the Romans were more willing to extend citizenship to include others who had previously been excluded, such as freed slaves.
Citizenship in Ancient Greece. In Greece, citizenship meant sharing in the duties and privileges of membership in the polis, or city-state*. Citizens were required to fight in defense of the polis and expected to participate in the political life of the city by voting. In return, they were the only ones allowed to own land and to hold political office. Because citizens controlled the wealth and power of the polis, the Greeks carefully regulated who could obtain citizenship. In general, only those free residents who could trace their ancestry to a famous founder of the city were considered citizens. Only on rare occasions would a polis grant citizenship to outsiders, usually only to those who possessed great wealth or valuable skills.
* city-state independent state consisting of a city and its surrounding territory
Answer:
Explanation:
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is an international non-profit digital rights group based in San Francisco, California. The foundation was formed in July 1990 by John Gilmore, John Perry Barlow and Mitch Kapor to promote Internet civil liberties and the health and growth of internet working.
The electronic Frontier Foundation is critical of media companies for their effort involved in litigation relating to a wide range of online and computer-related civil-liberty issues. In general, it has sought to extend free speech and privacy rights to online communications, including such forms of “speech” as encryption and other computer programs.
Also, it becomes a force to contend with in legal and political battles relating to computer-mediated communication and commerce. It also provides increased civil-liberties protections for online communication. electronic Frontier Foundation also helps to track down hackers.
