4 years ago

Which would most likely NOT be a result of rapid population growth in a region?

1 answer:

7 0

If this question regards the rapid population growth of HUMANS in a region, then I believe the most plausible answer would be D.

It is highly unlikely that natural environments such as forest land would be expanded, in actuality this land area would decrease, as a result of people building and developing on these areas. This is due to more room being needed as a result of the sudden rise in population.

You might be interested in

The geography of the fertile Crescent affected the growth of mesopotamian civilizations by

nika2105 [10]

Answer: Helping civilizations grow lots of food

Explanation: APEX

3 0

3 years ago

40 points brainlist and thanks

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

I can't save for college if I can't DRIVE to my job.

Explanation:

This is mostly likely to relate to question.

5 0

3 years ago

(intitle:resume or inurl:resume or intitle:csv or inurl:csv or inurl:vitae or intitle:cv or inurl:cv) "account executive" or "te

VARVARA [1.3K]

Caculatoin management decision officers

5 0

4 years ago

Why were congressmen worried about a strong central government?

Alex

They were afraid that the government would gain to much power.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did the sumerians built cities with walls around them?

Sedbober [7]

Ancient civilizations mostly important. some natural disasters maintained building construction so they are built around the walls

4 0

3 years ago