Answer:Judicial activism interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values. ... Judicial restraint limits the powers of judges to strike down a law, opines that the court should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
I think this would be False, but I could be wrong.
If this helps, brainliest would be very appreciated. <3
Answer:
C. Example A: separation of powers; Example B: checks and balances
Explanation:
These examples describe two events relating to the U.S. government, the answer choice that best matches the governmental policy that these events represent is separation of powers and checks and balances.
My bad, your question is incomplete, so my answer is probably wrong. Please disregard.
Answer: to my knowledge the answer is b
Explanation:
The most important principle is that there is no private ownership of property would be allowed
