Answer: A. The Supreme Court ruled that agencies enforcing the act were
defining "disability" too broadly.
Explanation: During the 1980’s, it became clear to the disability community that it should play a very active role in Supreme Court litigation under Section 504. The first Section 504 case which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1979, Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S.397, revealed at best, a lack of understanding, and also a hostility toward even applying the concept of discrimination to exclusion based on disability. In that case, a hearing impaired women was seeking admission to the nursing program of Southeastern Community College. The court found that Ms. Davis’s hearing impairment disqualified her to participate in the program because she would not be able to fulfill all of the clinical requirements. However, the Court did not limit itself to the fate of Ms. Davis, but included within the decision several very broad negative interpretations of Section 504.
Answer:
1 South africa nation
2. Dutch britich and african Zulu tribe
3. Shaka Zulu
4. Dutch Boers
5. British
6. Better weapons
7. British Empire
Explanation:
Answer:
It was worth it because was a motivation tool for white people to help the natives advance in their behaviors and their habits.
Explanation:
Peisistratos and his two sons, Hipparchus and Hippias.
