He believed that life, liberty, and property should be protected. He insisted that if these rights were to be taken away, there will be a high chance for people to rebel.
**I used this website: http://fee.org/articles/john-locke-natural-rights-to-life-liberty-and-property/ It explains this thoroughly.
i prob answered already 5 questions
Answer:
The answer is: making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources.
Explanation:
"Corroboration" is a process o<em>f proving a proposition, statement or idea with the help of an evidence.</em> Its purpose is to secure people when it comes to unreasonable sources of evidence (especially when such evidence is used against them).
The skill of corroboration is making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources. This means that it tries to confirm whether the initial evidence is indeed valid, true or verifiable.
Thus, this explains the answer.
I need more information affected by what?
In short he argued that, it was purely an executive branch conflict not a judicial one.
it wasfor the president not the courts to discover the scope of the executive privilege.
the need for executive confidentiality justified the application of privilege in this case.
