Answer:
D. All of these are correct
Explanation:
Option A should be included in the email privacy policy of a company.
--- The company should define the users email address authentic and not spam. The company should provides its users a legitimate email accounts and also explains the employees what happens to the email accounts once that employee leaves the company.
Option B should be included in the email privacy policy of a company.
--- Junk and spam emails are most annoying and useless emails in the corporate world. Employees should be explained not to send any junk messages using the company's email accounts. Sending spam mails are discouraged. Sending junk emails can also harm the computer and can steal important company data from the computer.
Option C should be included in the email privacy policy of a company.
--- The company should inform the email users of the organization that once an email is sent outside the organization, the organization have no control over the email sent and cannot stop neither can it change the content of the email.
Therefore the answer is ----
D. All of these are correct
I believe the answer is: <span>reciprocal determinism
According to </span><span>reciprocal determinism, the behaviors that displayed by individuals are all caused by a direct response that they made as a response to the social situations around them. Bandura believe, these behaviors could be modified through the use of social consequences.</span>
Answer:
Athletes - Legacy students.
Explanation:
What is analyzed in this study are the preferences for different types of applicant exercised by elite universities. As the study gathered, athletes are four times more likely that other students to gain admission whereas legacy students were just three times more likely to be admitted.
The result of the study described how elite universities gave added weight in admission decisions to applicants who have high SAT scores (above 1500), are African American, or are recruited athletes. There was also preference to Hispanic students as well as children of former students. It explains how those elite colleges extend preferences to many types of students and how this is controversial.
