Yes it is not because 40 thousand + 5 thousand = 90,000 which is close to her goal
Formula: 1/2(d1)(d2), 12+4=16/2.3+2.3=4.6, 16*4.6=73.6, 73.6/2=36.8. Area=36.8
-Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
3x - 10 = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's reconsider the wording of this problem.
"Ten less than the quotient of a number and
3 is 8."
From less, we can assume 10 is being subtracted from something.
We have:
-10
Next, we know that the quotient is the sum of a multiplication problem. So, we know 3 has to be multiplied by something. We can see that the text says 'a number'. If they don't give us the value we can guess that it is the variable x.
Now:
3x - 10
From 'is 8' we know that must be the final sum of the equation.
Finally:
3x - 10 = 8
Answer:
28 portraits
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's first figure out how many portraits Lamy can paint in 1 week, which is his <u>unit rate</u>. To calculate this, we just have to divide the number of portraits he paints by the amount of time it takes him to paint them.
In this case, the former quantity is 84 portraits, and the latter quantity is 6 weeks, so his unit rate is
= 14 paintings per week.
Now, we know that in 1 week, Lamy can paint 14 portraits. Therefore, since this is a <u>directly proportional relationship</u>, all we have to do to find how many portraits he can paint is 2 weeks is double the unit rate. This is because in a directly proportional relationship, if you multiply one variable by a number, you have to multiply the other by the same number to maintain equality, and here we are multiplying weeks by 2 so we need to multiply paintings by 2 as well.
Thus, Lamy can paint 14 · 2 = 28 paintings in 2 weeks.
Hope this helps!