I believe C is the correct answer by the process of elimination of the available answers.
Answer:
I would do a straight up speech, they are slightly more entertaining and you don't want to bore people with a slideshow mannn I hate slide shows.
He believed that the British were unfair to the Indians, and that the colonies were a liability to the nation.
Answer:
Explanation:
Summary:
In “The Piece of String,” the story would be very different if told from
the point of view of the farm hand who actually found the wallet. He
would most likely be shocked and concerned that the old man was taking
such grief for something he did not do. It also would have changed the
end of the story.
This is More Detailed:
Maitre Malandain probably does not truly believe that Maitre Hauchcorne has stolen the wallet, but having "the tendency to hold grudges," he takes advantage of an opportunity to deal misery to his foe.
Just as Saki satirized those of the Edwardian Age in England, Guy de Maupassant mocked the pettiness of the peasantry of Normandy, a province in northwestern France. In the exposition of his story, Maupassant describes the Norman women in the market who stubbornly held to their prices in the market and would only relent when a customer began to walk away. Then, they would shout after him or her, "All right...It's yours."
It is this same obstinate and petty...
<span> The allusion:
</span><span>"Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?"
affects the meaning of the poem the following way:
</span>The speaker wonders whether the creator who made the lamb would make the tiger.
Correct answer: A