Answer:C-Segways can reduce the amount of car traffic and auto emissions
Explanation:this is right
The flaw in the given statement about price and demand for airplane tickets is that; An increase in the price of a ticket will not cause a decrease in demand, but rather a decrease in quantity demanded.
<h3>Price and Demand</h3>
This is about price and demand.
Now, in macroeconomics, we know that;
As the price of a product increases, there will be a corresponding increase in the quantity of that product supplied (but not a change in supply) and as well a reduction in the quantity of that product demanded (but not a change in demand). This will happen until the equilibrium price is achieved.
Now, in our question we see that they are insinuating that an increase in price would lead to a change in demand and that does not correspond to macroeconomics principle.
Thus, the flaw in the statement is that An increase in the price of a ticket will not cause a decrease in demand, but rather a decrease in quantity demanded.
Read more about Price and demand at; brainly.com/question/2398546
Answer:
A) as mutually beneficial for people and government
Explanation:
Answer:
-2 and -12
Explanation:
A dilation is a transformation of a geometric image that is known to change its size not it shape.
The size of the figure basically depends on the scale factor (k).
When k >1 then there would be expansion.
When k <1 then there would be contraction.
When k=1 then no change in size
I.e for conraction the scale factor (k) must be negative
from the given options, the scale factor produce a contraction under a dilation of the original image would be -2 and -12
<h3 /><h3>Hence the correct answers are:-2 and -12 </h3>
Hope I helped
Answer:
For close to 50 years, educators and politicians from classrooms to the Oval Office have stressed the importance of graduating students who are skilled critical thinkers.
Content that once had to be drilled into students’ heads is now just a phone swipe away, but the ability to make sense of that information requires thinking critically about it. Similarly, our democracy is today imperiled not by lack of access to data and opinions about the most important issues of the day, but rather by our inability to sort the true from the fake (or hopelessly biased).
We have certainly made progress in critical-thinking education over the last five decades. Courses dedicated to the subject can be found in the catalogs of many colleges and universities, while the latest generation of K-12 academic standards emphasize not just content but also the skills necessary to think critically about content taught in English, math, science and social studies classes.
Explanation:
