Can you summarize the passage so that anyone helping could actually be able to give the answer or formulate one to admit the question?
Answer:
Short answer: More power due to theocracy.
An absolute monarch allows the government to control the wealth, status and life of the people. At first this may seem liberating but it could actually be good. Most people that were a monarch ran under a theocracy, they believed to have divine right from God himself. This would make the monarch the most powerful ruler, which means they would get to make decisions. As for the people they could always go to one person and count on one person for the greater good of their country. All decisions would be made by this monarch and the people wouldn't have to go through many. Change relied on changing the opinion of the monarch. If you had a bad monarch you are doomed and the people hate you. If you have a good monarch the people love you and you may thrive due to a better public ethic.
Umm is that the question or is there more?
Please i do not understand this question
