The answer should be : a free verse.
Hope this helps !
Photon
The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
Answer:
to inform readers by describing the city of Shihr. and to inform readers by describing the city of Shihr. I'm not 100% but hope this helps! lol
Explanation:
The above question wants to analyze your reading and writing skills. For that reason, I can't write your paragraph, but I'll show you how to write it.
<h3>Steps to create an alternate ending</h3>
- Read the original text.
- Understand the events that happen in the text.
- Associate these events with the official end of the text.
- Identify alternative consequences for the events in the text.
Write the alternative ending, showing different consequences than the events in the text and showing how the characters would be impacted by the changes.
You can use a cause and consequence structure, using the events already shown in the text.
Learn more about cause and consequence structure:
brainly.com/question/26460533
#SPJ1
The answer to your question Is letter B
