Answer:
How should one live?
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
What have I been taught to do?
How should one live?
What are the laws of my society?
Whom can one trust?
Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived around 470 B.C in Athens, he is considered the father of many subjects, Ethics being one of them.
Socrates never wrote a book but we know more about him and his thought thanks to Plato who wrote books in which he recreated the conversations his teacher would have with people in Athens.
The core question of his philosophy was "What ought one to do?", according to him if a person knows what is good, then the person will always do what is good. Thus, the goal of his philosophy was the pursuit of knowing what was good in order to live a good life. Thus, the key ethical question of him was "How should one live?" because a person who act in a good way would have a good better life than someone who didn't do this.
Answer:
En las Olimpiadas de la antigüedad los ganadores recibían manzanas y coronas de olivo y laurel. Por su triunfo se llevó una rama de olivo, en reconocimiento a los juegos de la antigüedad, y una medalla de plata con las imágenes de Zeus, la diosa de la victoria Nike y la Acrópolis de Atenas.
Explanation:
Es lo que se, espero y te sirva
Answer:
Continental Congress suggested that each state write its own constitution. ... Separation of powers is the division of political power among branches of government.
Explanation:
Interest-group governmental issues occur in the background, in official offices and administrative panels. They stimulate the association of customer gatherings to advance projects and are portrayed by changing unions as issues and impact move. Interests cut crosswise over partisan divisions; contribution by ideological groups is the exemption as opposed to the standard.
Approach changes gradually, as opposed to significant showdowns or essential moves in network esteems. These governmental issues may include endeavors, or dangers, to move to the more open majoritarian and pioneering legislative matters.
Deplorably bad or unsatisfactory.
