The assignment aims to analyze your arguing and writing skills. For this reason, I cannot write your essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a very short paragraph. This paragraph should introduce the subject of your essay, that is, it should introduce who Liesel is and her relationship with books.
- Thesis statement: Write only one sentence that should end the introduction. This sentence should show your opinion about Liesel stealing and burning forbidden books. You must show whether you believe she acted correctly or not.
- Body. Write two long paragraphs. In the first paragraph, you will explain your thesis statement and show the reader what makes you have this opinion about Liesel's actions. You must show facts and evidence to support your opinion. In the second paragraph, you will show an opinion contrary to your thesis statement and will explain the reasons that make this opinion wrong.
- Conclusion: You will restate the most important points of your essay and highlight how your thesis statement is relevant.
Below you can see an example of how the introduction and thesis statement can be done.
<em>Liesel's actions about books banned by Nazi Germany is one of the great points of "The Book Thief" that shows us how Nazism was oppressive and a limiting factor of knowledge. Accordingly, it is possible to determine that Liesel's actions in stealing and burning forbidden books were a sign of resistance and protest against this system.</em>
Learn more about Liesel:
brainly.com/question/8374761
#SPJ1
I'm pretty sure the answer is A
A direct democracy is the one in which all citizens vote on important decisions.
Further Explanation
A pure or direct democracy is the form of democracy whereby initiative of policies by the people are decided upon directly by themselves, neglecting the representatives or house of parliament. Meaning that In a direct democracy, all citizens form a governing body to vote directly on each issue, very much unlike the representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives from among themselves.
Direct democracy is the opposite of representative democracy. The best example of direct democracy existed in ancient Athens, Greece.
In Athens, women, slaves and immigrant are excluded from voting but all other citizens are required to vote on important issues of government. Court verdict are also determined by the people's votes.
Switzerland, on the other hand, practices a modified form of direct democracy in which laws enacted by elected representatives can be nullified or vetoed by the votes of the general public.
Also, the citizens have the authority to call for an amendment of the Swiss constitution.
However, there are advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy.
Advantages of direct democracy
- it allows full government transparency.
- it encourages government accountability.
- it promotes unity among the citizens
.
- it encourages direct responsibility
.
Disadvantages of direct democracy
- public participation would drop
.
- it allows corruption and manipulation
.
- decision making process is very difficult
.
- it could cause political instability.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- direct democracy
- advantages of direct democracy
- disadvantages of direct democracy
- athens
- switzerland
He was trying to show how it was back during his time. The two stories talked about people who have dreams but not all can be fulfilled.
