Answer:
Unsystematic; unsystematic
Explanation:
In the case of the large portfolio, the non-systematic risk that could be attached would have no effect on the total risk of the portfolio
So it is to be expected that the impact should be of non-systematic risk on different kind of stock that could be offset each other in order to remove out the risk to the investor that occurs from the sources of the risk
Answer:
<u>e. All of the above.</u>
Explanation:
Interestingly, all the above-listed options could serve as a possible reason why Amazon allows products sold by others to appear on its site.
<em>Remember, </em>Amazon is a marketplace;<em> </em>since the definition of a market involves dealings with several entities, it thus logical to expect Amazon to allow people (other sellers) to transact on its platform.
Answer:
No they should not be held accountable.
Explanation:
When the actions were taken in the past it was legal, now that it is illegal the companies should not be held accountable. If they are it will set a bad precedent that will affect a lot of companies.
In the case of GE that did experiments on prisoners to test effects of irradiation however, even if criminal charges are not brought against them, they can face charges. What they did was wrong even if it was legal then.
Answer:
The answer is. C) any buyer who is willing and able to pay the price will find a seller for the product.
Explanation:
At a product's equilibrium price, the quantity demanded of the product equals the quantity supplied of the product. So that means that there will always be a supplier willing to sell the product to any consumer who is willing to pay for that product.
Answer: 0.3
Explanation:
The Sharpe ratio is simply used by organizations and investors in order to compare the return on an investment to its risk.
From the question, we are informed that a portfolio has a 30% standard deviation generated a return of 15% last year when T-bills were paying 6.0%.
The Sharpe ratio will be:
= (15% - 6.0%)/30%
= 9%/30%
= 0.09/0.3
= 0.3