1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
13

How were Germany and Japan similar in the 1930’s and how were they different?

History
2 answers:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
6 0
Both became militaristic and started expanding their empires. However, Japan never developed a totalitarian
frez [133]3 years ago
5 0
They were similar insofar that both countries started developing their military and started having a spirit of nationalism grow. Both Japanese and Germans were tired of being looked down upon because they were proud and they decided to take the matter into their own hands. This especially worked well with Japan who managed to beat Russia in a war which showed everyone how serious they were.

They were different insofar that their ideas behind conquering differed. Japan wanted to expand and become powerful and develop even more. Germany wanted to conquer the entire continent of Europe and completely destroy anyone who did not fit their view of the world. Japan was more oriented towards using other countries in the are as colonies than it was in committing genocide and completely dominating everyone else. This doesn't mean however that Japan did not commit monstrous deeds in general during world war 2.<span />
You might be interested in
The view known as deep ecology is most essentially concerned with the idea that people depend on their environment in many ways.
vitfil [10]

Answer:

FALSE

Explanation:

Deep ecology, an ecological and environmental philosophy was developed in 1973 by a philosopher and mountaineer from Norway called Arne Naess.  Arne created the deep ecology concept which he said, was from “deep experience, deep questioning and deep commitment”.  

Some of the points in the eight organizing principles of deep ecology looked at the idea of human and nonhuman beings on earth, having interdependent values in themselves and also the importance of the ecosystem and natural processes

6 0
3 years ago
Do you think hitler and mussolini were more alike or different? explain why.
Mumz [18]
Hitler and Mussolini were more similar than different. Here is a list of reasons why this is the case.

1) Both rose to power during a time of crisis/instability- Hitler rose through the political ranks after the Germany economy suffered terribly due to the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles. Mussolini also rose to power at the same time, thanks to the instability of the Italian government.

2) Both eliminated other political parties- Mussolini and Hitler both got rid of their political opposition through force during their reigns.

3) Both censored the media- Controlling the media is one way in which both controlled their societies. By showing themselves in the best possible light, Hitler and Mussolini gained support from their citizens.

4) Both were totalitarian leaders- This meant that both men had complete control over their respective countries.
5 0
3 years ago
How did Rizal accept his execution? Explain your answer​
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

Rizal stood strong in his beliefs and even refused to sign the notification confirming his execution. Despite his conviction, he eventually agreed to his death sentence and signed it. The judge instructed him to sign the notification of sentence, which is required by law.

Explanation:

yaah

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is the main source of conflict and fighting in the Middle East between Israel and palestine
tangare [24]

The main issue is <u>land</u> and who is in control of it. The conflict between Israel and Palestine began in regard to the creation of the State of Israel.  Palestinians and Arab nations in the region did not welcome the establishment of a Jewish state on what had for centuries been Arab territory.

Details/context:

There had been Jewish immigration into the Palestine region since the end of the 19th century.  The movement of Jews back to what they saw as their ancestral territory escalated with the Zionist movement in the early 20th century.  Persecution against Jews in Europe (notably, pogroms in Russia in the 19th century and the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany in the 20th century) increased pressure for Jews to leave European countries.  

The Palestine region had been part of the Ottoman Empire up until the end of World War I.  A mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Ottoman colonial area after the conclusion of World War I.  The former Ottoman provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory.  The British exercised mandate rule over Palestine.  

After the Second World War II ended in 1945, the United Nations (UN) adopted a plan for the partition of Palestine that would create a portion of that territory as the state of Israel, with the other part as an independent state for Palestinian Arabs.  The Arabs in the region and surrounding Arab nations were not in favor of this, because they opposed the creation of a Jewish state in their region.  

As the British were ending their mandate governance of the region in May, 1948, the Jewish leaders in the land proclaimed their independence as a nation.  A war with Arab peoples and nations in the region followed.  Israel won that war and established itself as a nation.  Over 700,000 Palestinians fled their homes and land and have not been able to regain independent rights to their territory.

The new state of Israel was granted membership in the UN in 1949.  Israel won a series of wars (in 1967, 1973 and beyond) over against Arab states in the region.  Palestinians have made efforts against Israeli control, notably with movements called "Intifadas," in 1987 and 2000.  They have not been able to achieve nationhood status, however.

6 0
3 years ago
At the turn of the twentieth century, a sweatshop was a small work room in a large factory. a small factory with safe working co
pychu [463]

The correct answer is: " a small factory with unsafe working conditions"

Sweatshop is a term used to define a working place where people are forced to work under conditions which are considered unacceptable from a social viewpoint. Such work might be either dangerous, difficult, underpaid or done under extreme climatological conditions, for example. Workers might be working long hours for little money inside, or even children can be employed.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the triple alliance and the triple entente contribute to the start of ww1?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the first Americans get to North America?
    10·1 answer
  • Ralph Nader's book Unsafe at Any Speed brought about safety regulations in what products?
    10·2 answers
  • Who was Robert Oppenheimer?
    8·2 answers
  • Since we get most of our driving information from blank , the urban environment can induce visual overload.
    6·2 answers
  • How did the crusades accelerate change in Europe
    5·1 answer
  • Which act gave the East India Company an advantage over colonial merchants? a. Sugar Act c. Tea Act b. Declaratory Act d. Stamp
    7·1 answer
  • Which amendment is Representative London alluding to when he says: “There is only one way of facing an idea you fear or wish to
    6·1 answer
  • The Greensboro lunch counter sit-in of 1960 reflected mounting frustration at the slow pace of racial change felt by African Ame
    14·1 answer
  • What territory did the US take from spain after the spanish-american war
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!