Those students used the central route to persuasion, and were influenced by the quality of the persuasive argument.
<h3>What is a persuasive argument?</h3>
This is the type of argument that the person arguing engages in because they want to get the other party to see their point of view.
The goal is to ensure that the person you are talking to buys your idea and works with it. The way people go about this argument is through the use of logic and reasoning.
The goal is to try to be able to get the other person to adopt your pattern of reasoning and also take action based on that.
This can be referred to as a call to action by appealing to the emotions and the reasoning of your audience.
Read more on persuasive argument here
brainly.com/question/1790640
#SPJ1
Adaptive, flexible organizational cultures are less likely to foster transformational leadership than bureaucratic ones. Narcissistic leaders tend to bring out the best work behaviors in others.
Transformational leadership is about leaders going beyond their direct self-interest and working with their teams and followers to identify the changes needed and working with the members involved to influence, inspire, and implement change. A theory of leadership that creates a vision that drives and manages a group.
This self-interested change increases the maturity and idealism of the believer, as well as their interest in performance. It is an integral part of the full-range leadership model. Transformational leadership is when a leader's actions influence followers and encourage them to work beyond their perceived capacity. Innovative leadership inspires people to achieve unexpected or surprising results.
This gives employees autonomy in specific tasks and the power to make decisions after training. This creates a positive change in the mindset of your followers and the organization as a whole. A transformative leader typically exhibits her four different behaviors, also known as her four selves.
Learn more about Transformational leadership here : brainly.com/question/24109450
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
