1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
12

in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?

History
1 answer:
Vilka [71]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
You might be interested in
What major impact did the Protestant Reformation have on the Catholic Church?
Lunna [17]

It challenged Catholic traditions, forcing people to reassess the Catholic religion.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm Law 48:has flooded his field or carried away the crop, … in that ye
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

i need to borrow some points

Explanation:

sorry for this

5 0
2 years ago
Unlike the French Revolution, the American Revolution resulted in:
GrogVix [38]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
1. Cite text evidence that shows how Odysseus will repay the hospitality shown by Alcinous? Why
saul85 [17]

Odysseus will repay the hospitality shown by Alcinous is evident in lines 1-7 in book 9; And it is important as when they will survive, will remain friends and allies which is significant in political terms.

Explanation:

Odysseus will repay the hospitality shown by Alcinous which is both a necessary and an important turning point in the time of war which shows the significance of this vow as being the political terminology is upheld.

Odysseus and Alcinous will become friends at the end of the war in case of their survival of both of them. This survival and their friendship will lay down the political alliance to be established as a significant part of repayment of the hospitality.

6 0
3 years ago
What does literacy rate mean?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
A literacy rate is a percentage of people who are able to write compared to the people who don't know how to.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which herding dog is used the most for ranch work
    12·2 answers
  • Which adjective best describes English rule over the American colonies in general?
    8·2 answers
  • Sectionalism was a major part of the events that led to the civil war.What does sectionalism refer to?
    5·1 answer
  • ¿Que tuvieron que ver los boxers con la revolución industrial?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the feudal Sytem/Pyramid
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    12·2 answers
  • British traders started exchanging opium for
    8·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS HISTORY QUESTION!!
    11·1 answer
  • Betty friedan’s best-selling book of the 1960s observed that:.
    12·1 answer
  • Muckraking journalists
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!