1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
12

in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?

History
1 answer:
Vilka [71]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
You might be interested in
What role do parliaments play in a folkish state?
-BARSIC- [3]
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that in the folkish state the role of the parliament is to ensure the proper implementation of their rights.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
6 0
2 years ago
The reason Alexander the Great never saw the unification of his great empire was because of what tragic event?
Doss [256]

Answer:

It was his death in June 323 BCE.

Explanation:

By 323 B.C., Alexander was head of an enormous empire and had recovered from the devastating loss of his friend Hephaestion—who was also reputed to be one of Alexander’s homosexual male lovers.  Thanks to his insatiable urge for world supremacy, he started plans to conquer Arabia. But he’d never live to see it happen. After surviving battle after fierce battle, Alexander the Great died in June 323 B.C. at age 32.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the climate like in Africa along the equator
Vitek1552 [10]
The climate along the equator in Africa is Hot or tropical
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Delian League was originally created to...
nika2105 [10]

ANSWER YALL:

ITS D LIKE IN DOG WOOF WOOF

EXPLINATION BOIZ:

The Delian League (or Athenian League) was an alliance of Greek city-states led by Athens and formed in 478 BCE to liberate eastern Greek cities from Persian rule and as a defence to possible revenge attacks from Persia following the Greek victories at Marathon, Salamis, and Plataea in the early 5th century BCE

7 0
3 years ago
Antagonism arose among the conquered nomadic tribes of the xiongnu
Nata [24]
Whats the question? Because this is correct
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Supreme Court upheld both convictions on the grounds that
    12·2 answers
  • In 1994, the United Nations sponsored a conference in Cairo to discuss _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Abraham Lincoln is the 5th president of the united states, true or false?
    6·2 answers
  • 1.) Why did the revolutionaries who had set out to create a republic based on
    14·1 answer
  • Jefferson's Republican opponent in the 1800 election was:
    5·2 answers
  • How did racism limit the goals of the progressive era?
    7·1 answer
  • How did women become involved in the reforms of the Progressive movement?
    8·1 answer
  • In general, why do politicians give in to the demands of interest groups
    10·1 answer
  • What is a researcher?
    10·2 answers
  • What were hitler's pseudoscientific ideas​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!