1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
12

in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?

History
1 answer:
Vilka [71]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
You might be interested in
What happened when the Czechs tried to implement liberal reforms in 1968?
vazorg [7]
The USSR and other Warsaw pact nations invaded
7 0
3 years ago
Unlike political parties, interest groups
Stolb23 [73]
There are 2 answers that fits the meaning of interest groups. It is letter b and c. Interest groups are also called pressure group. This are group of people or an organization that has the concers and trying to influence public policy in thier favor. They are concerns with various issues or problems that gave them hindrances to win control of the government. They pressure the policy makers by lobbying. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are 4 things Juan Rodriguez cabrillo for people to hate him
Digiron [165]

idk did he crane kick them

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As discussed in the extraordinary claims box, when the giant impact idea was first proposed, it was generally thought to be so u
telo118 [61]

The correct answer is:

An understanding of the number and size of leftover planetesimals in the early solar system.

The giant-impact hypothesis proposes that the Moon was created out of what was left of a collision between Earth and an astronomical body the size of Mars, around 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon. The heavy bombardment was a period when leftover planetesimals hit planets during the solar system's first hundred million years.

3 0
3 years ago
The rock-cut relief decorating the palace of Shapur I at Bishapur depicts ____. a. ​ the goddess Inanna b. ​ the coronation of S
liraira [26]

Answer:

c. ​ Shapur’s capture of the Roman emperor

Explanation:

In the year 260 CE shapur I succeeded in the capture of the roman emperor valerian near edessa (turkey). This victory was such an important event that he wanted to commemorate it with rock cut relief in the palace, this relief is intended to draw attention to the king

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best explains how going to work affected women during and after world war 1
    9·1 answer
  • The First Great Awakening, the Enlightenment, and events between 1754 and 1776 drastically altered the American definition of fr
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT TRUE regarding the government established by the constitution
    14·2 answers
  • Why did king leonidas disobey the councils vote in the movie 300?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the chief commanding officer during the vietnam war was?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes an ancient Greek tragedy?
    13·1 answer
  • Toward the end of the Civil War, what did General Sherman's Special Field
    6·1 answer
  • The Constitution establishes three branches of government that
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following plants is commonly used to treat sore eyes?
    13·1 answer
  • Organizations like al qaeda are so difficult to defeat because they
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!