Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
You can fined nature preserves with komodo dragons in Wae Wuul, Wolo Tado and Riung, which harbors extant Komodo dragon populations on the west and north coast, respectively.
<h3>What is a Nature Park?</h3>
Nature Parks refers to natural reservations which is home to a variety of natural animals for the sole aim of preservation and for tourism.
The islands of Komodo, Rinca, Nusa Kode and Gili Motang are part of Komodo National Park.
The island of Flores houses three nature reserves, Wae Wuul, Wolo Tado and Riung, harbour extant Komodo dragon populations on the west and north coast, respectively.
Learn more about Nature parks at brainly.com/question/22051598
#SPJ1
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
Answer:
is this a question? or are u just bored
Explanation: