Answer:
Yes, it is used to describe sound in words.
Explanation:
Answer: (brainliest)
D
Explanation:
The suspense of knowing the character will come in contact with the (nasty pea nuts) causes alarm/suspense in the passage
The sentence can be written as Carlos was more disappointed than me when we were both cut from the soccer team. In this sentence, the pronouns are 'me and we ' and both denote nominative pronouns.
A nominative pronoun refers to the subject or clause of a sentence. The subject refers to the person who is being talked about in the sentence. This sentence deals with the subjects 'me and we.' So these will denote the nominative pronouns of the sentence. Pronouns are those words that can be used as the nouns of the sentence we are writing.
The objective pronoun refers to the object of the sentence. For example: Where is the house? It is here. In this sentence, the word ' it ' refers to the object of the sentence. So this is not according to the pronouns given to us in the sentence. So the pronouns will be identified as a nominative pronouns.
Learn more about nominative or objective pronouns here:
brainly.com/question/902291
#SPJ4
For this question, the choices are:
<span>1) Each
2) Both
3) Either
4) Neither
</span>
And the answer is both because it is the only plural pronoun that refers to one or more nouns in the sentence, hence the use of "were". Each, either and neither refer to only one of the other and thus would use "was" instead of "were" to refer to a singular noun.
Based on this passage, we can conclude that the author (B.) prefers the documentary over "Lords of Dogtown".
This excerpt shows that the author thinks that making a movie based on the documentary <em>Dogtown and Z-Boys</em> directed by Stacy Peralta was unnecessary. Moreover,<u> the writer argues that, in contrast to the documentary, the movie, which was directed by Hardwicke, is weak</u>. In that way, the writer implies that he/she prefers the documentary over the movie "Lords of Dogtown", which was released in 2005.
