Answer:
1808.
Explanation:
<em>"There is a sense in which the Clause is no longer constitutionally relevant since it expired in 1808. At the time the Constitution was adopted, there was no guarantee whether or when the federal Congress would act to prohibit the importation of slaves. So there is a legitimate inquiry about what took place in the political realm over the 20-year period between the adoption of the Constitution and 1808. During that time period, popular support for the abolition of the slave trade and slavery itself increased both in the United States and in other countries. There was more support for restricting the slave trade initially than slavery itself in this time period. In the 1790s, Congress passed statutes regulating the trade in slaves by U.S. ships on the high seas. The United Kingdom and other countries also passed legislation restricting the slave trade, increasing international pressure on the United States to likewise curb the practice."</em>
<em />
<em />
Source: constitutioncenter.org
Answer:
The need for slaves weren't needed as much as they were in the southern parts
Explanation:
Answer:
The Virginia plan and New Jersey plan were the two plans presented at the Constitutional convention in 1787, both the plan dealt with the nature of the constitution. According to the Virginia Plan, the source of legislative power should be derived from the people based on popular representation, while in New jersey plan it was proposed to be derived from the States and to be based on equal votes for each state. The Virginia plan proposed the Legislative structure to be Bicameral while the New York plan supported Unicameral Legislature.
The perception people may have of south africa may be very dry and hot, perhaps poorer than other countries. They have this perception because of history and the fact most slaves took place here which created a hard background to get rid of.
