1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reika [66]
3 years ago
13

Why were many Americans in favor of going to war with Mexico? They knew the only way to annex Texas was to declare war on Mexico

. They believed it was necessary in order to gain more territory. They needed territory where Native Americans from the East could be resettled. They thought that defeating Mexico would lead to the possession of Oregon.
History
2 answers:
prohojiy [21]3 years ago
7 0
One of the reasons why so many Americans were in favor of going to war with Mexico was because "They believed it was <span>necessary in order to gain more territory," since it was clear that Mexico was not going to sell the land voluntarily. </span>
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
7 0

Answer;

They knew the only way to annex Texas was to declare war on Mexico.

Explanation;

At this time Texas was still connected to Mexico.

There were various reasons as to why the United states and Mexico went to war, but the most important ones were the US annexation of Texas and the Americans' desire for California and other Mexican territories

The United States won the war and Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.

You might be interested in
John Locke thiught people were neither good nor bad naturally.How did Hobbes views differ from lockes
ruslelena [56]

Answer:  Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

5 0
3 years ago
Write two to three sentences in which you explain whether or not Franklin’s cartoon was effective. Did its point come across eas
kompoz [17]

Yes Franklin's cartoon of join or die was very effective. It had a snake that had been cut into eighths and each segment represented colonies of America. Benjamin Franklin editorial game under America's “United colonies” showing an urge to join against the British during the Revolutionary war.

8 Cuts of the snake show the separated colonies and it was a clear depiction for those colonies to join in order to make a difference in power.

It came across as a great persuasion and influence them to get organized to fight against outside enemies.  The political cartoon meant a great deal in combining people against enemies.

8 0
3 years ago
Help me with this!!!!!!!!
Masteriza [31]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Queen Elizabeth send Sir<br> Walter Raleigh to do?
Art [367]
Sir Walter Raleigh was an English explorer, soldier and writer. At age 17, he fought with the French Huguenots and later studied at Oxford. He became a favorite of Queen Elizabeth after serving in her army in Ireland. He was knighted in 1585, and within two years became Captain of the Queen's Guard.
8 0
3 years ago
List some political, social and economic effects of the Industrial Revolution.
Korvikt [17]

Martin Luther king was a black american that had a dream .

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who invaded constantinople in 1453? arab muslim armies ottoman turk armies roman catholic armies eastern orthodox armies?
    10·1 answer
  • The key issue for the major parties in the 1848 presidential election was
    8·1 answer
  • Land with different territories under a single rule
    7·1 answer
  • During the glided age how did the US congress respond to the rise of monopolies
    10·1 answer
  • What is meant by the term "satellite state"?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Hammurabi have his laws engraved in stone and placed in a public place
    5·1 answer
  • Which famous French landmark did Napoleon save from demolition?
    10·1 answer
  • Classical Civilization in China
    11·1 answer
  • What does Long propose people do once they become millionaires?
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the three branches goverment and briefly explain the responsibility of each branch.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!