Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
Answer:
the tendency toward a relatively stable equilibrium between interdependent elements, especially as maintained by physiological processes.
Explanation:
Answer:
The majority of bills introduced to the US Congress in any given year die in the committees, this is simply because most bills that are introduced are not good or important enough to be passed.
Among the reasons that may cause a bill to "die in committee" we have: the bill is uproperly written, the bill deals with an issue that is not considered to be important by the committee, the bill is a duplication of an existing law, or the bill was never meant to become a law in first place.
Answer:
The description of the given question is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
A day, my child said, "You're very much loud as well as disturbing." When he was on the mobile device, I told him an interesting issue. He posted this comment just after the mobile. It was bullying me.
- I have worked hard with my families all my existence. I have always provided about my child and just never refused any of his requests. I rarely gave him any sort of frustration or frustration. He's founded right now, and I've done all for his government. I figured my son was going to appreciate my commitment.
- And therefore his demeaning speaking upset me. I couldn't contain myself, so I was curious about what I had in my life to do with such selfish commitment to my career. Although he posted this statement, there has been a tone of frustration, negligence, disrespect, negligence, respectively. It confirms, of course, that he created this remark to harm me.
- I had been so stunned I was lost for words. I was complaining to my wife. But it wasn't that bad. I walked out the door from him because he dropped into one room. I was always realizing that my entire career was pointless.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
obedience because if you are obedient is good
