All categories

2 years ago

The biggest losers in the institutional treasury management case were:

1 answer:

8 0

The biggest losers in that case were the tax payers.
Under the institutional treasury management case, it involved the frauding of millions of dollars that is hidden from a certain investment account.
If not being fraud ,These millions of dollar should've resulted in about 40% tax rate that will be used by the government for the benefit of the taxpayers in the form of welfare or other infrastructures

You might be interested in

Poppy co. uses a periodic inventory system. beginning inventory on january 1 was understated by

Dahasolnce [82]

Poppy co. uses a periodic inventory system. Beginning inventory on January one was understated by $30,000, and its ending inventory on December thirty-one was understated by $17,000. A purchase of merchandise costing $20,000 was incorrectly recorded as a $2,000 purchase. None of these errors were discovered until the next year. As a result, Prunedale's cost of goods sold for this year was: Understated by $31,000.

8 0

3 years ago

If the Fed sells $2 million of bonds to the First National Bank, what happens to reserves and the monetary base?

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Reserves fall by $2 million, and the monetary base falls by $2 million.

Explanation:

In the books of First National Bank, the purchase of $2 million of bonds by First National Bank, from the Federal Reserve means there is a reserve with the Federal Reserve represented by security which stands as asset.

In the books of the Federal Reserve, The sales of bonds to First National Bank will create a liability from the reserve assets.

See attached for the T-accounts explain the answer

Download docx

4 0

2 years ago

Sometimes food is produced in other countries that do not have the same level of chemical safety as in the US. This imported foo

Artemon [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": affordable food creates an external benefit rather than an external cost in the case.

Explanation:

Externalities are costs third parties have to be responsible for even if they were not involved in causing the externality. There are positive externalities and negative externalities. Positive externalities are those that third parties benefit from. Negative externalities affect third parties.

Thus, importing less-expensive but chemically-dangerous food will create a positive externality to consumers purchasing those types of foods since less money is getting out of their pockets without them having to influence discounts.

4 0

2 years ago

Which was not an example of a business ethical dilemma discussed by Albert Carr in his article on business bluffing?

kap26 [50]

Answer:

The correct answer is d. Failure to support climate-change treaties.

Explanation:

An ethical dilemma is a situation in which an apparent operational conflict between two ethical imperatives is presented in such a way that obedience to one of them implies the transgression of the other. In general, it is called an ethical dilemma when an agent (the professional, in this case) has reasons to carry out two actions (or more), each of which favors a different principle, and it is not possible to fulfill them without violating any of they. In this way, the agent is in a situation in which he is condemned to commit a foul: no matter what he does, he will do something "wrong" or will miss an obligation.

8 0

3 years ago

When this market is in equilibrium, price is $ $6 and quantity bought and sold is 300 units. In equilibrium, consumer surplus is

Gnom [1K]

Answer: hello your question is incomplete attached below is the missing information

Answer :

$900

$600

Given the new price of $4 by Government

quantity demanded = 400 units

quantity supplied = 150 units

quantity bought and sold = 150 units

$975

$150

$375

Explanation:

Consumer surplus ( area below demand curve and above $300

= Area of triangle = 0.5 * base * height

= 0.5 * 300 ( 12 - 6 ) = $900

producer surplus ( area above supply curve and below $300

= Area of the triangle = 0.5 * 300 ( 6-2 ) = $600

Given the new price of $4 by Government

quantity demanded = 400 units

quantity supplied = 150 units

quantity bought and sold = 150 units

Consumer surplus ( area of triangle + area of rectangle )

= 0.5 * 150 * ( 12-9 )+ L*B

= 0.5 * 150 * ( 3 ) + 150 * ( 9 - 4 ) = $975

producer surplus ( Area of triangle )

= 0.5 * 150 * (4-2) = $150

deadweight loss ( area of triangle )

= 0.5 * ( 300 - 150 ) ( 9-4 )

= $375

6 0

2 years ago