The Open Door Policy is a term in foreign affairs initially used to refer to the United States policy established in the late 19th century and the early 20th century that would allow for a system of trade in China open to all countries equally. It was used mainly to mediate the competing interests of different colonial powers in China. In more recent times, Open Door policy describes the economic policy initiated by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 to open up China to foreign businesses that wanted to invest in the country. This later policy set into motion the economic transformation of modern China.[1]
The late 19th century policy was enunciated in Secretary of State John Hay's Open Door Note, dated September 6, 1899 and dispatched to the major European powers.[2] It proposed to keep China open to trade with all countries on an equal basis, keeping any one power from total control of the country, and calling upon all powers, within their spheres of influence, to refrain from interfering with any treaty port or any vested interest, to permit Chinese authorities to collect tariffs on an equal basis, and to show no favors to their own nationals in the matter of harbor dues or railroad charges. Open Door policy was rooted in the desire of U.S. businesses to trade with Chinese markets, though it also tapped the deep-seated sympathies of those who opposed imperialism, with the policy pledging to protect China's sovereignty and territorial integrity from partition. It had little legal standing, and served in the main the interests of competing colonial powers without much meaningful input from the Chinese, creating lingering resentment and causing it to later be seen as a symbol of national humiliation by Chinese historians.
In the 20th-century and 21st-century, scholars such as Christopher Layne in the neorealist school have generalized the use of the term to applications in 'political' open door policies and 'economic' open door policies of nations in general which interact on a global or international basis.
1. "S<span>ettlement by agreeing each give up part of his or her demands". This statement is a perfect example of compromise. It's the fairest way to deal with armed or unarmed conflicts, because both parties would have equal rights.
2. Mercenaries are soldiers paid to fight for someone. If my knowledge provides me well, they are usually neutral to the conflict and their motivation is only private gain.
3. </span>Hessians are german soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War. Hessians are german mercenaries. Almost 30 000 hessian mercs were hired by British to help with American revolution.
4. <span>British general Gage. As far as I remember Thomas Gage is best know for his long year participation in American Revolution as a military commander.
5. </span>Fort Ticonderoga captured by Ethan Allen's army. If my memory serves me well this fort was captured during American Revolution in 1775<span> by </span>Green Mountain Boys who were led by American Revolution hero Ethan Allen.<span> </span>
The answer is C i believe
Answer:
“Summit Crisis,” a newsreel about the U-2 Incident and the collapse of the 1960 Paris summit. The United States and Britain refused to agree to the Soviet demands, arguing that a free Berlin, with no guaranteed access to the West, would soon be controlled by communist East Germany.
Explanation:
It involved two teams of men. The game lasted until the sun passed a set line. Each team tried to get a ball through a sideways hoop attached to a wall(like a sideways basketball hoop, minus the net). I only know one way to score, and that is to get the ball through the hoop. Hope that helps!