Answer: Brutal military organization, fear of authority, and lack of empathy.
Explanation:
That statement speaks of a fierce military structure in the German army. Such a statement is not isolated; it is a common phrase used by a war criminal. It is, in fact, an individual dismissal of responsibility for a crime that is not justified because these people could have refused to execute the order.
On the other hand, there was a fear of certain sanctions if individual orders were not killed, but this could not and should not be used as an excuse at any time. Such statements indicate that these individuals are, in fact, people without attitude, people who lack empathy, or are influenced by completeness, so they believe that evil is right. It is essential to refute such statements also for the sake of the higher good since humanity touched the civilization floor during the Second World War.
Anti-Federalists were against the Constitution, so I'm fairly certain that the rest of that statement goes:
According to the Anti-Federalists, a governing document such as the Constitution should most certainly fail to protect the rights of individuals and the states.
That's the most I've got with how much you gave, I'll probably need specific choices to choose from for a more satisfying and accurate answer.
The answer is land bridge
Many things took place within a period of time between 1492 and 1520 that are quite questionable but with the intent of finding a complete opposite location, for the result Columbus had effects such as....
•The provoking of genocide
•The taking of land from which originally had indigenous people living there
•Now I personally don't know if Columbus in his life time claimed he discovered America but I do know a sci-fi and fantasy auther was the one with the idea to make this a common myth when really his 3 main voyages never even touched what is now American soil.
But in the end we as Americas wouldn't be here if it wasn't for his crude sense of exploration
Answer:
The accumulation of fortunes changed after the civil war because the wealth of the northerners increased based on property wealth (real estate) while that of the south reduced drastically due to reliance on personal properties (slaves trade).
Explanation:
The changed in fortunes accumulation was result of the type of properties that was owned by wealthiest people in the Northern side and the southerns.
The wealth of the northerners increased after the civil because they have accumulated fortunes in areas of property holdings up to 50% increase while properties owned by southerners fell by a massive 75% due to their wealth majorly build on properties that includes slaves.
