Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
The answer for this question is: Stabilize the reaction
Chemicals with highly energetic reaction will have more risk to create high-energy force if we somehow fail to contain it safely.
When you need to evacuate, this type of reaction could create an explosion, so it's really advised to stabilize the reaction first.
Answer:
The answer is explained below
Explanation:
The companies board of directors as well as you would consider whether it is best to install the scubber system. When determining whether to install the scubber system both short and long term consequences are to be considered. If presently, the level of pollution is legal, you need to consider if in the future it would be legal? if the installation of the scubber system would affect the public relations of the company. After considering all this, it would be better to install because the pollution can lead to death, and the neighborhood can sue the company. Also the EPA regulations can be regulated.
Answer:
$570,000
Explanation:
At the time of recording of the fixed assets, the fixed assets should be reported at purchase cost or historical price or originally cost or acquiring cost, whether all other values are given i.e appraisal value, the seller purchased value, similar warehouse book value, etc
So, in the given case, it would be recorded at $570,000 as the buyer purchase the building at this cost only.
