I believe the answer is D because that's what the federal system of government means in america.
When information is modified by individuals not authorized to change it, you have suffered a "loss of integrity".
Data integrity alludes to the precision and consistency, legitimacy of information over its life-cycle. Disintegrated information, all things considered, is of little use to undertakings, also the threats introduced by delicate information loss. Hence, keeping up data integrity is a center focal point of numerous enterprise security arrangements.
<span>The correct answer is the size of the department as this is
the likely basis of which how will define and to know the specialized units
that may exist in a department. It is because if there is a small department
then it is likely that the police working in that department have only few
working officials unlike those residing in a big department.</span>
Answer:
No, it violates antitrust laws
Explanation:
Antitrust law as applicable to Real Estate, is a law that is made to protect stakeholders: buyers, sellers or other parties involved in a potential or actual contract relationship from practices that may be considered as void such as price fixing (often times lowering of prices), rigging of bids, allocation of customers or markets, running of multiple listing services individually or collectively, and group boycotts.
Hence, in this case, this is a case of price-fixing where by two participants on the same side, have agreed to fix a price, in which the 5% may have imposed high prices on consumers. Thus, it is considered illegal, and violates antitrust law.
