Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
Answer:
Tam<u>bém</u>, nin<u>guém</u>, arma<u>zéms</u>, al<u>guém</u>, para<u>béns</u>, a<u>lém</u>, re<u>fém</u>, Vin<u>tém</u>.
Explanation:
Silaba tônica é silaba que tem o som mais forte e mais longo dentro de uma palavra. Você pode identificar a sílaba tônica pronunciando as palavras em voz alta e nalisando qual das sílabas você pronunciou com mais força e qual delas possui um som mais longo. quando a palavra possui assento, como as apresentadas na sua pergunta, a sílaba que possui o acento é a sílaba tônica.
Espero que essa resposta tenha te ajudado. Entretanto, é preciso ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português nesse site, fora do campo "World Languagens" como você fez agora. Isso porque esse não é o site brasileiro, mas sim o site estadunidense. Se você postar pergntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens", a sua pergunta pode ser excluída sem resposta.
Yes it is true because they can overturn a conviction that happened in a trial court.
Answer:
The ideas of community and democracy are "not related."
Explanation:
In case of community they take the soul charge for the running of the system, they have the power as well as the capacity to take decision and also take the responsibilities for the changes that has been occurred. But when we talk about democracy, the citizen has the power by the method of voting. In democracy people are given equal rights and also freedom. When required compromise is also acceptable in democratic system.
This law is unlikely to be constitutional.
The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.
