1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ICE Princess25 [194]
4 years ago
12

Which was a result of the peace conference led by prince mitternich of austria?

History
1 answer:
bonufazy [111]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

d) Nationalism began to grow and spread.

Explanation:

Klemens Von Metternich was a diplomat of Austria who gained the title of Prince for his contribution to the country. He led the peace conference at Vienna from the Austrian sides to decide the fate of post-Napoleonic Europe. His policy of aligning more towards Russia and less towards Prussia. Secondly, the division of Poland among Austria, Prussia, and Russia consolidated a rise in nationalism.

You might be interested in
What was the historical significance of Barack Obama’s election in 2008?
snow_tiger [21]
The most significant thing about Obama's election in 2008 was that he was the first black president to ever hold the presidency.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The dynasties that ruled Asia and Egypt After the death of Alexander the great were led by???
marin [14]

Answer:

It was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty, which started with Ptolemy I Soter's accession after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and which ended with the death of Cleopatra and the Roman conquest in 30 BC.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The founder of Georgia was ______
Anton [14]
D) james oglethorpe

God bless!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what the great compromise was? <br><br> Help me please
grin007 [14]

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a reason for the failures of the Interstate Commerce Act, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and the Ding
Sophie [7]

I believe it is the first choice: The new regulations caused investors to lose money on their stocks.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In essence, _____ was a call for the post-war South to take on the more industrial aspects that were seen as beneficial for the
    6·2 answers
  • When mexico became a part of nafta, along with canada and the united states, it:?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best analyzes criticisms of the New Deal?
    15·2 answers
  • How would you contrast the way Japanese Americans were treated with how they acted during world war 2
    10·1 answer
  • 1. True or False: John F. Kennedy was the patrician son of a wealthy businessman.
    15·1 answer
  • is it true or false When the General Court was first created, towns had the right to send their own representatives to the Gener
    14·1 answer
  • Which events can cause tsunamis?
    5·2 answers
  • What happened to mycenaereans civilization during the dark age?
    15·1 answer
  • Please please help me with this question.
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the tone or emotion of The Beauty of Philippine Island poem
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!