Explanation:Thomas Hobbes 'and John Locke's are famous political philosophers.There views regarding human nature similar at some places but at some other places they differ.
Similarities:
- Both the philosophers have given importance to human nature.
- Both the philosophers consider that there is need of government to exercise control over human beings.
- Both also refers to the risk that might arise when no governmental control is there.
- Both highlighted the point that there should be equality among humans,otherwise it might give rise to war like situations.
Differences:
Hobbes believed that human beings are not humble at all ,they are cruel by nature.As per him the fittest will survive so the need government to control them ,otherwise there will be war like situations.
Locke's believed that humans are social creatures ,they want to be the part of society.humans have good nature and they need government to maintain that nature.
I agree with Locke's point of view.His views are more positive as compared to Hobbes'
Establishment of the nations conquered and destroyed by Germany
Answer:
Virginia was the colony that relied on plantation the most.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)
The answer is A) His approach faced objection from all sides and could not garner enough support for passage. Bush's proposals were rejected by several factors: First)<em> The lack of support and resistance that he faced from not only the Democratic Party</em> but also from within his party because they perceived the projects as measures that were going to reward illegal immigrants. Second) While the reforms offered a different set of opportunities, representatives of the immigrant community saw <em>the focus of the measures as very narrow</em> because it put a lot of importance on family ties. Third) Some labor unions saw the assortment of plans and options of the reforms that will result in a wave of <em>cheap migrant labor</em>, one that they claimed took labor jobs from US citizens.
