1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
4 years ago
12

Which of these statements reflect the ways that Rwandan community courts and the international community dealt with the genocide

against Tutsis and slaughter of moderate Hutus? Select all that apply.
The international courts bowed to the wishes of the traditional courts and allowed them to prosecute all of the leaders of the genocide.


The international courts tried the main leaders of the genocide.


The traditional community courts executed most of the people who took part in the killings.


The Rwandan traditional community courts’ main goal was to achieve truth and reconciliation.


The traditional community courts returned many of the people who took part in the killings to their communities.


The international courts’ main goal was to punish the Tutsis who caused the genocide.
(multiple questions can be choosen)
History
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]4 years ago
7 0

"The international courts tried the main leaders of the genocide" and "The traditional community courts returned many of the people who took part in the killings to their communities" seem like the only reasonable answers but I haven't taken this class in a while so my memory on this is a little foggy. I hope I helped.

You might be interested in
Which right is protected in the Florida Constitution but not the U.S. Constitution? A. right to bear arms B. right to work C. ri
tangare [24]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A. right to bear arms." The <span>right that is protected in the Florida Constitution but not the U.S. Constitution is that of the </span><span>right to bear arms. That is the correct answer as far as the rights are concerned.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a factor that contributed to African involvement in the slave trade?
uranmaximum [27]
The lack of Peace agreements definitely contributed as did the conflicts between tribes, I am not even sure what is meant by the first choice, there was no African nationalism at the time so I eliminate it as the choice also. That leaves C. It makes no sense that traders would use guns as methods of trade. The tribes at the time didn't have guns, slave traders would not want them to be able to kill rather than capture so the only ones who has guns were the traders and they wouldn't have given them up because it gave them the up because it gave them the upper hand over the natives they were trading with.
Hope this helped :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is better for the country and why? Sectionalism Nationalism or Manifest Destiny? What is better for the country and why? Se
Norma-Jean [14]
None are "better" it depends on the country

one can work for another country, but not for this country, each has its good things and bad things

for example: communism vs democracy

the government controls everything in communism, giving the citizens no chance to voice their own opinions, however, that means everybody is "equal" in a sense

in democracy, there are poor people, and rich people, the poor people want more money, the rich want to keep their titles of "rich", which may spark hatred and other things. 

These are two examples. Again, none of them are better than another, it really depends on the people.

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Which event led to the Spanish-American War?
docker41 [41]

Answer:

C. the sinking of the USS Maine

Explanation:

The reasons for war were many, but there were two immediate ones: America's support the ongoing struggle by Cubans and Filipinos against Spanish rule, and the mysterious explosion of the battleship U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor.

4 0
4 years ago
Why was the 3rd amendment added to the constitution?
IgorC [24]

Answer and explanation:

The 3rd amendment prohibited the requirement of quartering soldiers of American citizens' homes. What does this mean? Well, back when America was powered by King George III, when a soldier wanted to, they could enter someone's home. Americans were required to housekeep the soldiers, give them food, shelter, etc. The people didn't like this, so when they declared independence, they made the Bill of Rights. And on the Bill of Rights, they made 10 amendments, and the 3rd one said that Americans no longer had to housekeep the soldiers. Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Liberty Bonds work?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the printing press positively affect newspaper design? A. It attracted reporters to journalism. B. It increased computer
    12·2 answers
  • . What are the 3 theories as to what happened to the people of the Indus River Valley?
    7·1 answer
  • One of the first scientists of the Renaissance to advance taxonomy through firsthand observations was _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Homo erectus was the first species to travel outside of ____.
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the first president born after the revolutionary war and, therefore, the first president born as a u.s. citizen?
    5·1 answer
  • The woman who opened the first birth control clinic in the u.s. was
    14·1 answer
  • History lesson 6.01 <br> describe the factory line system and the assembly line
    15·1 answer
  • Define: Representative Democracy/Republic​
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the BEST definition of PRODUCTIVITY?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!