Answer:
Kings and lords would view this statement as a very aggressive one against their kingdoms if they were not contextualized.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place if the kings and lords who heard this statement didn't have the religious context to understand it, they would feel assaulted or threatened because they would take it literally instead of metaphorical. That is the reason why we have to contextualize our public before we tell share our ideas with them.
Answer:
Britain --- won territory and expanded empire
France --- lost territory and influence
Spain --- gained territory but did not settle it
American colonies --- gained territory and sense of unity
American Indians --- could not keep promised territory
Explanation:
The French and Indian War was a military conflict developed between 1754 and 1763 in North America, between Britain and France, for control of the territories adjacent to the Great Lakes.
During this conflict, the French were aided by Native Americans and, to a lesser extent, by the Spanish. In turn, the bulk of the British combatants were American settlers.
The end result of this war was the total annexation of the French colonies in America by Great Britain, as well as the secession of Louisiana to Spain by France.
For the Americans, this war meant the creation of a strong and unifying national identity, while for the Native Americans it meant a great loss of power in their ancestral territories.
Answer:
both were fear and it was the logical sense of the fact that they have been afraid of the "Hun" so why shouldnt they be afraid of the reds.
Explanation:
I believe that the three countries which were fighting for control over North America were England, Spain, and France.
All of these countries wanted to have a piece of this new continent they accidentally discovered. Somehow, France got the northern parts (Canada especially), Spain got the southern parts (especially Mexico), and England got the middle.
